October 21, 2024 ☼ Crypto ☼ Payments
“The RToken peg is maintained by allowing full minting and redeeming for the underlying collateral on-chain (Source)”.
But what if the arbitrage mechanism between the chain and secondary exchanges fails? Potential deviations can cause mistrust, leading to panic selling and potential system collapse.
I use this post to think about potential risks, arbitrage, and solutions to maintain trust and price stability. Arbitrage isn’t just a feature — it’s the first line of defense.
If collateral can’t be liquidated during RToken redemption, panic selling may trigger a “bank run.” Exchange prices could collapse, and recovery depends on restoring liquidity and confidence.
High fees or slow processes make arbitrage unprofitable. Prolonged price gaps can arise, especially during network congestion
Complex redemptions, high fees, or inefficient liquidation weaken arbitrage effectiveness during stress.
Capital controls or trading restrictions may block on-chain or off-chain trading. If one major exchange fails, price stabilization depends on alternatives.
High volatility deters arbitrage due to slippage or loss risks. Rapid swings can halt stabilization efforts.
Malicious actors could exploit friction to pump and dump, destabilizing markets and eroding trust.
Collateral devaluation or inaccessibility (e.g., During the SVB collapse, Circle lost access to some USDC reserves) can trigger panic and temporary depegging despite assurances of stability.
Arbitrage is key to maintaining the RToken peg, but risks like illiquidity, friction, regulation, and volatility can disrupt it. Mitigation through liquidity prioritization, monitoring, and proactive responses enhances stability and preserves the peg under stress.
This article is part of a series on the Reserve Protocol:
Notes on the Reserve Protocol — Governance
Notes on the Reserve Protocol — Arbitrage (current)